Philippine Civil Law: Legal Redemption, Contracts, and Consumer Protection Q&A
Economics

Philippine Civil Law: Legal Redemption, Contracts, and Consumer Protection Q&A

8

Terms

0

Plays

0

Favorites
Shares
Description

Test your knowledge of key legal concepts in Philippine law with this flashcard set covering legal redemption, agency, co-ownership, chattel mortgage, and consumer protection. Ideal for law students, bar exam reviewers, or anyone studying Civil Law and Special Laws. Includes situational questions and answers based on real-life applications and statutory interpretations, including topics from the E-Commerce Act and rules on valid sales and deficiencies in chattel mortgages.

Top Scores
Show Less
ghost_fill
No players yet
Be the first one to play!
Cards
Show Less
Sales

A contract whereby one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership of and to deliver a determinate thing and the other to pay therefore a piece certain in money or its equivalent is a contract of

Traditio constitutum possessorium

A form of delivery which takes place after the seller of the property continues in possession of said property no longer as owner but as a mere possessor

The sale is void because of the absence of separation of properties between spouses.

A husband and his wife were living together under a conjugal partnership of gains. Later, because of a quarrel, the wife left the husband without judicial approval. They have thus been living apart for more than ten years. The wife later sold her land to the said husband. Is the sale valid?

A cannot recover the deficiency even if there is stipulation to the contrary

A sold her specific car to B for P200,000 payable in 5 equal installments. A delivered the car to B but a mortgage was constituted on the car to answer for the unpaid installments B paid the first2 installments but failed to pay the last 3 installments. A foreclosed the mortgaged property and sold it at public auction for P100,000. Which is correct?

Yes, for the vendor need not own the property at the time of perfection, it being sufficient that he be the owner at the time he is to deliver the object.

A sold to B land, which at the time of sale did not belong to A. Is the sale valid?

Earnest Money

A sum of money paid, or a thing delivered upon the making of a contract for the sale of goods, to bind the bargain, the delivery and acceptance of which makes the final assent of both parties to the contract.

C can not exercise the right of redemption because the sale was made in favor of a co-owner.

A, B & C are co-owners of an undivided parcel of land, A sold his 1/3 interest to B absolutely. Which is correct?

No one will be preferred as there is no right of legal redemption exists because A donated his share to X. There was no purchase, no dation in payment, to transmission by onerous title.

A, B, and C are co-owners in equal shares of a one-hectare rural land, the adjoining owner to which are D and E, the latter owning the smaller area. A donated his share of the land owned in common to X who is a rural land owner. Upon proper notice of conveyance, B, C, D and E
sought to exercise the right of legal redemption over the share conveyed. Who among them, if any, should be preferred?